3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 62 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Schaar v. Lehigh Valley Health Services, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Schaar v. Lehigh Valley Health Services, Inc. Anchor | green | “unsupported assertions, conclusory allegations or mere suspicions” | 29 |
| 2 | Byron Halsey v. Frank Pfeiffer | green | “an inference based upon a speculation or conjecture does not create a material factual dispute sufficient to defeat summary judgment.” | 27 |
| 3 | Malik v. Hannah | green | “without identifying the facts disputed and without to evidence in the record that raises an issue of fact regarding that point, is insufficient to survive summary judgment.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.