5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 61 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Painter's Mill Grille, LLC v. Howard Brown.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Painter's Mill Grille, LLC v. Howard Brown Anchor | green | “need not accept as true unwarranted inferences, unreasonable conclusions, or arguments,” | 24 |
| 2 | Holloway v. Pagan River Dockside Seafood, Inc. | green | “whether the plaintiff has a right to be in the district court at all and whether the court has the power to hear and dispose of the claim.” | 22 |
| 3 | Fent v. Oklahoma Water Resources Board | green | “constitutes a bar to the exercise of federal subject matter jurisdiction” | 6 |
| 4 | Adams v. Southwest Virginia Regional Jail Authority | green | “while a pro se litigant's pleadings are liberally construed, a pro se complaint must still contain sufficient facts to raise a right to relief above the speculative level and state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.” | 6 |
| 5 | Fent v. Oklahoma Water Resources Board | green | “immunity constitutes a bar to the exercise of federal subject matter jurisdiction.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.