6 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 61 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Alexandro Puga v. About Tyme Transport, Inc.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alexandro Puga v. About Tyme Transport, Inc Anchor | green | “as a general rule, questions relating to the bases and sources of an expert's opinion affect the weight to be assigned that opinion rather than its admissibility.” | 14 |
| 2 | Alexandro Puga v. About Tyme Transport, Inc | green | “while the district court must act as a gatekeeper to exclude all irrelevant and unreliable expert testimony, 'the rejection of expert testimony is the exception rather than the rule.” | 13 |
| 3 | Gregory Johnson v. Arkema, Incorporated | green | “reasoning or methodology must be properly applied to the facts in issue.” | 11 |
| 4 | Gregory Johnson v. Arkema, Incorporated | green | “be grounded in the methods and procedures of science and be more than unsupported speculation or subjective belief.” | 10 |
| 5 | Alexandro Puga v. About Tyme Transport, Inc | green | “is not to weigh the expert testimony to the point of supplanting the jury's fact-finding role-the court's role is limited to ensuring that the evidence in dispute is at least sufficiently reliable and relevant to the issue so that it is appropriate for the jury's consideration.” | 10 |
| 6 | John Brown v. Natl Railroad Passenger Corp. | green | “must make 'a preliminary assessment of whether the reasoning or methodology underlying the testimony is . . . valid and of whether that reasoning or methodology properly can be applied to the facts in issue.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.