Topic: e are confident that congress could not have intended to de… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #560

8 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 48 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp..

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. Anchor
scotus · 2000
green “e are confident that congress could not have intended to delegate a decision of such economic and political significance to an agency in so cryptic a fashion.” 12
2 United States v. Bass
scotus · 1971
green “nless congress conveys its purpose clearly, it will not be deemed to have significantly changed the federal-state balance.” 10
3 General Dynamics Land Systems, Inc. v. Cline
scotus · 2004
green “even for an agency able to claim all the authority possible under chevron, deference to its statutory interpretation is called for only when the devices of judicial construction have been tried and found to yield no clear sense of congressional intent.” 8
4 United States v. Bass
scotus · 1971
green “ujnless congress conveys its purpose clearly, it will not be deemed to have significantly changed the federal-state balance.” 5
5 Hess v. Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corporation
scotus · 1994
green “egulation of land use a function traditionally performed by local governments.” 4
6 General Dynamics Land Systems, Inc. v. Cline
scotus · 2004
green “eference to statutory interpretation is called for only when the devices of judicial construction have been tried and found to yield no clear sense of congressional intent.” 4
7 Kane v. City of Beaverton
orctapp · 2005
green “here are a number of rational and legitimate reasons for disparate treatment of 'island' territories . . . .” 3
8 Hess v. Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corporation
scotus · 1994
green “a function traditionally performed by local governments.” 2

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check