Topic: judicial review of an arbitration award is very limited. · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #5610

7 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 61 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Bound Brook Board of Education v. Glenn Ciripompa (076905).

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Bound Brook Board of Education v. Glenn Ciripompa (076905) Anchor
nj · 2017
green “judicial review of an arbitration award is very limited.” 23
2 Linden Board of Education v. Linden Education Ass'n
nj · 2010
green “in the public sector, an arbitrator's award will be confirmed 'so long as the award is reasonably debatable.” 10
3 Policemen's Benevolent Ass'n v. City of Trenton
nj · 2011
green “fully supportable in the record.” 8
4 Policemen's Benevolent Ass'n v. City of Trenton
nj · 2011
green “an extremely deferential review when a party to a collective bargaining agreement has sought to vacate an arbitrator's award.” 7
5 County College of Morris Staff Ass'n v. County College of Morris
nj · 1985
green “to ensure finality, as well as to secure arbitration's speedy and inexpensive nature, there exists a strong preference for judicial confirmation of arbitration awards.” 6
6 Policemen's Benevolent Ass'n v. City of Trenton
nj · 2011
green “although arbitrators may not look beyond the four corners of a contract to alter unambiguous language, where a term is not defined, it may be necessary for an 'arbitrator to fill in the gap and give meaning to that term.” 4
7 City Ass'n of Supervisors & Administrators v. State Operated School District
njsuperctappdiv · 1998
green “the clear and unambiguous language of the agreement . . . .” 3

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check