5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 61 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Jackson.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Jackson Anchor | green | “unreasonable, improbable, or so unsatisfactory as to justify a reasonable doubt of the defendant's guilt.” | 19 |
| 2 | People v. Belknap | green | “whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the state, 'any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.” | 18 |
| 3 | People v. Belknap | green | “whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the state, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.” | 15 |
| 4 | People v. Joiner | green | “none of these factors, standing alone, conclusively establishes the reliability of identification testimony; rather, the trier of fact is to take all of the factors into consideration.” | 6 |
| 5 | People v. Corral | green | “it is for the fact finder to judge how flaws in part of the testimony affect the credibility of the whole.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.