3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 60 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Jackson v. Conway.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jackson v. Conway Anchor | green | “the essential factual and legal premises of his federal constitutional claim to the highest state court capable of reviewing it.” | 28 |
| 2 | Murden v. Artuz | green | “adequate to support the judgment.” | 17 |
| 3 | Jackson v. Conway | green | “this requires that the prisoner 'fairly present' his constitutional claim to the state courts, which he accomplishes 'by presenting the essential factual and legal premises of his federal constitutional claim to the highest state court capable of reviewing it.” | 15 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.