Topic: fairly discernible in the statutory scheme. · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #5655

6 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 60 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Thunder Basin Coal Co. v. Reich.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Thunder Basin Coal Co. v. Reich Anchor
scotus · 1994
green “fairly discernible in the statutory scheme.” 22
2 Thunder Basin Coal Co. v. Reich
scotus · 1994
green “of the type congress intended to be reviewed within the statutory structure.” 12
3 Thunder Basin Coal Co. v. Reich
scotus · 1994
green “foreclose all meaningful judicial review” 9
4 Axon Enterprise, Inc. v. FTC
scotus · 2023
green “a special statutory review scheme . . . may preclude district courts from exercising jurisdiction over challenges to federal agency action.” 9
5 Whitney National Bank in Jefferson Parish v. Bank of New Orleans & Trust Co.
scotus · 1965
green “designed to permit agency expertise to be brought to bear on particular problems,” 5
6 Whitney National Bank in Jefferson Parish v. Bank of New Orleans & Trust Co.
scotus · 1965
green “where congress has provided statutory review procedures designed to permit agency expertise to be brought to bear on particular problems, those procedures are to be exclusive” 3

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check