7 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 60 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from City of Indianapolis v. Edmond.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | City of Indianapolis v. Edmond Anchor | green | “general interest in crime control.” | 14 |
| 2 | Donovan v. Dewey | green | “sufficiently comprehensive and defined that the owner of commercial property cannot help but be aware that his property will be subject to periodic inspections undertaken for specific purposes.” | 10 |
| 3 | Ferguson v. City of Charleston | green | “divorced from the state's general interest in law enforcement.” | 10 |
| 4 | United States v. George E. Garcia | green | “to ascertain whether consent is valid, courts examine the totality of all the circumstances to determine whether the consent was a product of that individual's free and unconstrained choice, rather than a mere acquiescence in a show of authority.” | 8 |
| 5 | Security And Law Enforcement Employees v. Carey | green | “factors to be taken into account in determining the extent of the legitimate expectations of privacy.” | 6 |
| 6 | Anobile v. Pelligrino | green | “the contours of the december 1997 administrative searches of highly regulated areas such as race tracks were not clearly established.” | 6 |
| 7 | Equine Practitioners Ass'n v. New York State Racing & Wagering Board | green | “general jurisdiction over all horse racing activities and all pari-mutuel betting activities, both on-track and off-track, in the state and over the corporations, associations, and persons engaged therein.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.