2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 60 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Emil Jutrowski v. Township of Riverdale.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Emil Jutrowski v. Township of Riverdale Anchor | green | “to prevail on a conspiracy claim under 1983, a plaintiff must prove that persons acting under color of state law 'reached an understanding' to deprive him of his constitutional rights.” | 35 |
| 2 | Capogrosso v. the Supreme Court of New Jersey | green | “must provide some factual basis to support the existence of the elements of a conspiracy: agreement and concerted action.” | 25 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.