4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 60 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Stubbs.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Stubbs Anchor | green | “passing treatment of an issue or lack of reasoned argument is insufficient to allow for our meaningful review.” | 19 |
| 2 | State v. Stubbs | green | “passing treatment of an issue or lack of reasoned argument is insufficient to allow for our meaningful review.” | 17 |
| 3 | State v. Stubbs | green | “passing treatment of an issue or lack of reasoned argument is insufficient to allow for our meaningful review.” | 14 |
| 4 | Regan v. McLachlan | green | “we will not address issues raised without proper citation to legal authority.” | 10 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.