5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 59 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Doris L. Gossett v. Du-Ra-Kel Corporation, D/B/A Swanee's Motel, and Duane v. Swanson, Individually.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Doris L. Gossett v. Du-Ra-Kel Corporation, D/B/A Swanee's Motel, and Duane v. Swanson, Individually Anchor | green | “bald assertions of ultimate facts.” | 21 |
| 2 | TIG Insurance v. Sedgwick James of Washington | green | “conclusory allegations and denials, speculation, improbable inferences, unsubstantiated assertions, and legalistic argumentation.” | 16 |
| 3 | Darrell L. Burrell v. Dr. Pepper/seven Up Bottling Group, Inc. Dr. Pepper/seven Up Bottling Group, L.P. | green | “and a fact is genuinely in dispute only if a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the non-moving party.” | 13 |
| 4 | Carrizales v. State Farm Lloyds | green | “the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” | 6 |
| 5 | Carrizales v. State Farm Lloyds | green | “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.