10 canonical passages across 10 cases, quoted by 60 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In re Z.C..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In re Z.C. Anchor | green | “must weigh the evidence and all reasonable inferences, consider the credibility of the witnesses, and determine whether, in resolving conflicts in the evidence, the finder of fact clearly lost its way and created such a manifest miscarriage of justice that the judgment must be r…” | 18 |
| 2 | State v. Jones | green | “if the evidence is susceptible of more than one construction, the reviewing court is bound to give it that interpretation which is consistent with the verdict and judgment, most favorable to sustaining the verdict and judgment.” | 7 |
| 3 | State v. Rodano | green | “proof of guilt may be supported 'by circumstantial evidence, real evidence, and direct evidence, or any combination of all three, and all three have equal probative value.” | 6 |
| 4 | State v. Jackson | green | “the relevant inquiry is whether, after viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime proven beyond a reasonable doubt.” | 6 |
| 5 | State v. Dodson | green | “must weigh the evidence and all reasonable inferences, consider the credibility of the witnesses, and determine whether, in resolving conflicts in the evidence, the finder of fact clearly lost its way and created such a manifest miscarriage of justice that the judgment must be r…” | 6 |
| 6 | State v. Webb | green | “determine whether the evidence, if believed, would convince the average person of the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.” | 5 |
| 7 | Parma Hts. v. Brett | green | “if the evidence is susceptible of more than one construction, the reviewing court is bound to give it that interpretation which is consistent with the verdict and judgment, most favorable to sustaining the verdict and judgment.” | 3 |
| 8 | ShiftMed, L.L.C. v. Westchester Parkway Consulting, L.L.C. | green | “the term 'abuse of discretion' means a ruling that is unreasonable, arbitrary, or unconscionable.” | 3 |
| 9 | State v. Jefferson | green | “in order to substantiate a claim for ineffective assistance of counsel, a defendant must satisfy a two-prong test.” | 3 |
| 10 | State v. Clark | green | “inconsistencies or contradictions in a witness's testimony do not entitle a defendant to a reversal of a trial.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.