4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 60 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Colvin v. Derwinski.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Colvin v. Derwinski Anchor | green | “a reasonable possibility that the new evidence, when viewed in the context of all the evidence, both new and old, would change the outcome.” | 30 |
| 2 | Colvin v. Derwinski | green | “reasonable possibility that the new evidence, when viewed in the context of all the evidence, both new and old, would change the outcome.” | 14 |
| 3 | Colvin v. Derwinski | green | “there must be a reasonable possibility that the new evidence, when viewed in the context of all the evidence, both new and old, would change the outcome.” | 10 |
| 4 | Jones v. Derwinski | green | “in the context of the other evidence of record” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.