4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 47 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Commonwealth v. Zirkle.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Commonwealth v. Zirkle Anchor | green | “e have held that a claim that a court did not weigh the factors as an appellant wishes does not raise a substantial question.” | 22 |
| 2 | Commonwealth v. Disalvo | green | “his court has held on numerous occasions that a claim of inadequate consideration of mitigating factors does not raise a substantial question for our review.” | 12 |
| 3 | Commonwealth v. Disalvo | green | “this court has held on numerous occasions that a claim of inadequate consideration of mitigating factors does not raise a substantial question for our review.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.