5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 59 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Nathaniel MOSLEY Et Al., Appellants, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION Et Al., Appellees.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nathaniel MOSLEY Et Al., Appellants, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION Et Al., Appellees Anchor | green | “all reasonably related claims for relief by or against different parties to be tried in a single proceeding.” | 23 |
| 2 | Phillips v. Norris | green | “in order to determine whether an inmate possesses a liberty interest, we compare the conditions to which the inmate was exposed in segregation with those he or she could 'expect to experience as an ordinary incident of prison life.” | 16 |
| 3 | Brother Patrick Portley-El v. Hoyt Brill | green | “consistently held that administrative and disciplinary segregation are not atypical and significant hardships under sandin.” | 9 |
| 4 | Brother Patrick Portley-El v. Hoyt Brill | green | “make a threshold showing that the deprivation of which he complains imposed an 'atypical and significant hardship.” | 6 |
| 5 | Robert D. Sprouse v. David Babcock, Charles Harper and Ronald G. Welder | green | “the filing of a false disciplinary charge is not itself actionable under 1983” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.