Topic: are mutually exclusive-rule 60(b)(6), as a residual catchal… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #5826

7 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 59 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Theodore Frank v. Target Corporation.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Theodore Frank v. Target Corporation Anchor
ca7 · 2018
green “are mutually exclusive-rule 60(b)(6), as a residual catchall, applies only if the other specifically enumerated rules do not.” 10
2 Bennie Kennedy v. Schneider Electric
ca7 · 2018
green “rule 60 relief is limited to 'extraordinary' situations where a judgment is the inadvertent product of special circumstances and not merely the erroneous application of law.” 9
3 Joseph Arrieta v. Deirdre Battaglia, Warden
ca7 · 2006
green “must be made 'within a reasonable time.” 8
4 Kyler Moje v. Federal Hockey League LLC
ca7 · 2015
green “a lawyer's errors are imputed to the client.” 8
5 Kyler Moje v. Federal Hockey League LLC
ca7 · 2015
green “a litigant must show that both its own conduct and its lawyer's fit the category of 'excusable' neglect.” 8
6 Theodore Frank v. Target Corporation
ca7 · 2018
green “delineates six grounds upon which relief from a judgment can be granted,” 8
7 Dzik v. Bayer Corp.
ca7 · 2017
green “attorney inattentiveness to litigation is not excusable, no matter what the resulting consequences the attorney's somnolent behavior may have on a litigant.” 8

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check