5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 59 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Daniel.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Daniel Anchor | green | “assess the credibility of the witnesses, weigh the evidence presented, resolve conflicts in the evidence, and draw reasonable inferences from the evidence.” | 14 |
| 2 | People v. Siguenza-Brito | green | “search out all possible explanations consistent with innocence and raise them to a level of reasonable doubt.” | 13 |
| 3 | People v. Givens | green | “must allow all reasonable inferences from the record in favor of the prosecution.” | 11 |
| 4 | People v. Bradford | green | “so unreasonable, improbable, or unsatisfactory that it justifies a reasonable doubt of the defendant's guilt.” | 11 |
| 5 | People v. Bradford | green | “the evidence is so unreasonable, improbable, or unsatisfactory that it justifies a reasonable doubt of the defendant's guilt.” | 10 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.