5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 59 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Gnall v. Gnall (073321).
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gnall v. Gnall (073321) Anchor | green | “we defer to the credibility determinations made by the trial court because the trial judge 'hears the case, sees and observes the witnesses, and hears them testify,' affording it 'a better perspective than a reviewing court in evaluating the veracity of a witness.” | 21 |
| 2 | N.T.B. v. D.D.B. | green | “a trial court's order entered following trial in a domestic violence matter, we grant substantial deference to the trial court's findings of fact and the legal conclusions based upon those findings.” | 11 |
| 3 | Hes v. Jcs | green | “the totality of the circumstances to determine whether the harassment statute has been violated.” | 10 |
| 4 | G.M. v. C.V. | green | “binding on appeal when supported by adequate, substantial, credible evidence.” | 9 |
| 5 | SD v. Mjr | green | “so manifestly unsupported by or inconsistent with the competent, relevant, and reasonably credible evidence as to offend the interests of justice.” | 8 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.