3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 58 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from David Holt, as Personal Representative of the Estates of James W. Holt and Joan Holt, Deceased v. United States.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | David Holt, as Personal Representative of the Estates of James W. Holt and Joan Holt, Deceased v. United States Anchor | green | “must accept the allegations in the complaint as true.” | 24 |
| 2 | SK Finance SA v. La Plata County, Board of County Commissioners | green | “reference to evidence outside the pleadings does not convert the motion to dismiss into a motion for summary judgment in such circumstances.” | 18 |
| 3 | SK Finance SA v. La Plata County, Board of County Commissioners | green | “may not presume the truthfulness of the factual allegations in the complaint, but may consider evidence to resolve disputed jurisdictional facts.” | 16 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.