4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 58 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from O'Connor v. Uber Technologies, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | O'Connor v. Uber Technologies, Inc. Anchor | green | “fundamentally fair, reasonable, and adequate” | 26 |
| 2 | Haralson v. U.S. Aviation Servs. Corp. | green | “fundamentally fair, reasonable, and adequate.” | 15 |
| 3 | In Re Tableware Antitrust Litigation | green | “consider plaintiffs' expected recovery balanced against the value of the settlement offer.” | 14 |
| 4 | In Re Washington Public Power Supply System Securities Litigation | green | “evaluates objectively the strengths and weaknesses inherent in the 24 litigation and the impact of those considerations on the parties' decisions to reach these 25 agreements.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.