7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 58 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Woods v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Woods v. State Anchor | green | “as consistent with innocent activity as with criminal activity” | 24 |
| 2 | Davis v. State | green | “that there is something out of the ordinary occurring and some indication that the unusual activity is related to crime.” | 12 |
| 3 | Woods v. State | green | “the reasonableness of a temporary detention must be examined in terms of the totality of the circumstances and will be justified when the detaining officer has specific articulable facts, which taken together with rational inferences from those facts, lead him to conclude that t…” | 7 |
| 4 | Arguellez v. State | green | “the detaining officer need not personally be aware of every fact that objectively supports a reasonable suspicion to detain; the cumulative information known to the cooperating officers at the time of the stop is to be considered in making the reasonable-suspicion determination.” | 5 |
| 5 | Arredondo v. State | green | “it is not the number of criminal actions that is determinative but whether the intent to engage in continuous criminal activities was shown.” | 4 |
| 6 | Johnson v. State | green | “seized until he has yielded to a law enforcement officer's show of authority or when officers physically limit his movement,” | 3 |
| 7 | Higgins v. State | green | “rendered moot by findings subsequently made by the trial court, that appellant was . . . not under the influence of narcotic drugs when he made the statement” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.