3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 58 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Bagley.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Bagley Anchor | green | “so fundamental as to amount to a miscarriage of justice or which probably resulted in the jury reaching a different verdict than it otherwise would have reached.” | 35 |
| 2 | State v. Collins | green | “so fundamental that it denied the defendant a fair trial and quite probably tilted the scales against him.” | 19 |
| 3 | State v. Bagley | green | “probably resulted in the jury reaching a different verdict than it otherwise would have reached.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.