4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 58 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Quarles v. Derwinski.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Quarles v. Derwinski Anchor | green | “on remand, the appellant will be free to submit additional evidence and argument” | 36 |
| 2 | Quarles v. Derwinski | green | “on remand, the claimant will be free to submit additional evidence and argument” | 10 |
| 3 | Quarles v. Derwinski | green | “the appellant will be free to submit additional evidence and argument” | 8 |
| 4 | Williams v. Brown | green | “there is significant evidence in support of an appellant's claim, the board must provide a satisfactory explanation as to why the evidence was not in equipoise.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.