Topic: not every ambiguity, inconsistency, or deficiency in a jury… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #6024

4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 57 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Middleton v. McNeil.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Middleton v. McNeil Anchor
scotus · 2004
green “not every ambiguity, inconsistency, or deficiency in a jury instruction rises to the level of a due process violation.” 26
2 United States v. Frega
ca9 · 1999
green “in reviewing jury instructions, the relevant inquiry is whether the instructions as a whole are misleading or inadequate to guide the jury's deliberation.” 18
3 United States v. Terrill Dixon
ca9 · 2000
green “a single instruction to a jury may not be judged in artificial isolation, but must be viewed in the context of the overall charge.” 8
4 United States v. Frega
ca9 · 1999
green “jury instructions, even if imperfect, are not a basis for overturning a conviction absent a showing that they prejudiced the defendant.” 5

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check