4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 57 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Marshall v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Marshall v. State Anchor | green | “albeit to a very limited degree.” | 26 |
| 2 | Hall v. State | green | “a valid, rational alternative to the charged offense.” | 23 |
| 3 | Ritcherson, Kaitlyn Lucretia | green | “first, we compare the statutory elements of the alleged lesser offense and the statutory elements and any descriptive averments in the indictment.” | 5 |
| 4 | Guzman v. State | green | “we compare the elements of both offenses to determine whether, in proving the offense as charged, the state necessarily had to prove all the elements of the lesser offense, plus something more.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.