6 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 57 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Arredondo.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Arredondo Anchor | green | “to set aside a jury verdict for insufficient evidence it must clearly appear that upon no hypothesis whatever is there sufficient evidence to support the conclusion reached by the jury.” | 32 |
| 2 | State of Arizona v. Robert Francisco Borquez | green | “support a conclusion of defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.” | 10 |
| 3 | State v. Pena | green | “do not reweigh the evidence to decide if we would reach the same conclusions as the trier of fact.” | 5 |
| 4 | State of Arizona v. Robert Francisco Borquez | green | “is such proof that reasonable persons could accept as adequate and sufficient to support a conclusion of defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.” | 4 |
| 5 | State v. Arredondo | green | “clearly appears that upon no hypothesis whatever is there sufficient evidence to support the conclusion reached by the jury.” | 3 |
| 6 | State of Arizona v. Robert Francisco Borquez | green | “do not reweigh the evidence to decide if we would reach the same conclusions as the trier of fact.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.