6 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 56 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Griffith v. United Air Lines, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Griffith v. United Air Lines, Inc. Anchor | green | “a more flexible rule which permits analysis of the policies and interests underlying the particular issue before the court.” | 17 |
| 2 | Griffith v. United Air Lines, Inc. | green | “in favor of a more flexible rule which permits analysis of the policies and interests underlying the particular issue before the court.” | 13 |
| 3 | Griffith v. United Air Lines, Inc. | green | “permits analysis of the policies and interests underlying the particular issue before the court.” | 9 |
| 4 | CIPOLLA v. Shaposka | green | “greater interest in the application of its law.” | 8 |
| 5 | McSwain v. McSwain | green | “has demonstrated, by reason of its policies and their connection and relevance to the matter in dispute, a priority of interest in the application of its rule of law.” | 5 |
| 6 | Virginia J. Barry Melville v. American Home Assurance Company | green | “approaches of both the restatement ii (contacts establishing significant relationships) and 'interests analysis' (qualitative appraisal of the relevant states' policies with respect to the controversy).” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.