6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 56 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Williams.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Williams Anchor | green | “considers the matter anew and freely substitutes its own judgment' for that of the lower tribunal.” | 24 |
| 2 | Spector United Employees Credit Union v. Smith | green | “if different material conclusions can be drawn from the evidence.” | 11 |
| 3 | Moore v. Crumpton | green | “even where there is no dispute as to the essential facts, where reasonable people could differ with respect to whether a party acted with reasonable care, it ordinarily remains the province of the jury to apply the reasonable person standard.” | 8 |
| 4 | Kessing v. National Mortgage Corporation | green | “since this rule provides a somewhat drastic remedy, it must be used with due regard to its purposes and a cautious observance of its requirements in order that no person shall be deprived of a trial on a genuine disputed factual issue.” | 7 |
| 5 | Dendy v. Watkins | green | “unless it is perfectly clear that no issue of fact is involved and inquiry into the facts is not desirable to clarify the application of the law.” | 3 |
| 6 | Moore v. Crumpton | green | “it ordinarily remains the province of the jury to apply the reasonable person standard.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.