4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 55 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Montanez v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Montanez v. State Anchor | green | “review de novo 'mixed questions of law and fact' that do not depend upon credibility and demeanor.” | 24 |
| 2 | Ford v. State | green | “to suppress evidence on an alleged fourth amendment violation, the defendant bears the initial burden of producing evidence that rebuts the presumption of proper police conduct.” | 16 |
| 3 | State v. Villarreal, David | green | “a nonconsensual search of a dwi suspect's blood conducted pursuant to the mandatory-blood-draw and implied-consent provisions in the transportation code, when undertaken in the absence of a warrant or any applicable exception to the warrant requirement, violates the fourth amend…” | 8 |
| 4 | Montanez v. State | green | “mixed questions of law and fact” | 7 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.