4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 55 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Nourison Rug Corp. v. Parvizian.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nourison Rug Corp. v. Parvizian Anchor | green | “after the deadlines provided by a scheduling order have passed, the good cause standard must be satisfied to justify leave to amend the pleadings.” | 36 |
| 2 | Cook Ex Rel. Estate of Cook v. Howard | green | “good cause requires the party seeking relief to show that the deadlines cannot reasonably be met despite the party's diligence, and whatever other factors are also considered, the good-cause standard will not be satisfied if the district court concludes that the party seeking re…” | 9 |
| 3 | Cook Ex Rel. Estate of Cook v. Howard | green | “show that the deadlines cannot reasonably be met despite the party's diligence,' and whatever other factors are also considered, 'the good-cause standard will not be satisfied if the district court concludes that the party seeking relief (or that party's attorney) has not acted …” | 5 |
| 4 | Cook Ex Rel. Estate of Cook v. Howard | green | “under rule 16(b)(4), a party must first demonstrate 'good cause' to modify the scheduling order deadlines, before also satisfying the rule 15(a)(2) standard for amendment.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.