5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 54 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Tandy v. City of Wichita.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tandy v. City of Wichita Anchor | green | “the standing inquiry ensures that a plaintiff has a sufficient personal stake in a dispute to ensure the existence of a live case or controversy which renders judicial resolution appropriate.” | 25 |
| 2 | Kane County, Utah v. United States | green | “article iii standing requires a litigant to show: (1) an injury in fact that is (a) concrete and particularized and (b) actual or imminent, not conjectural or hypothetical; (2) the injury is fairly traceable to the challenged conduct; and (3) the injury can likely be redressed b…” | 11 |
| 3 | Morgan v. McCotter | green | “is whether plaintiff has suffered a present or imminent injury, as opposed to a mere possibility, or even probability, of future injury.” | 8 |
| 4 | Nova Health Systems v. Fogarty | green | “the plaintiff must show that a favorable judgment will relieve a discrete injury, it need not relieve his or her every injury.” | 7 |
| 5 | Citizen Center v. Gessler | green | “involves invasion of a legally protected interest that is concrete, particularized, and actual or imminent.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.