4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 54 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Ranger Insurance v. Pierce County.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ranger Insurance v. Pierce County Anchor | green | “a genuine issue of material fact exists where reasonable minds could differ on the facts controlling the outcome of the litigation.” | 34 |
| 2 | Ranger Insurance v. Pierce County | green | “the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” | 10 |
| 3 | Ranger Insurance v. Pierce County | green | “reasonable minds could differ on the facts controlling the outcome of the litigation.” | 7 |
| 4 | State Ex Rel. Zempel v. Twitchell | green | “may not weigh the evidence, assess credibility, consider the likelihood that the evidence will prove true, or otherwise resolve issues of material fact.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.