5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 54 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from MacKinnon v. MacKinnon.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MacKinnon v. MacKinnon Anchor | green | “a reviewing court should uphold the factual findings undergirding the trial court's decision if they are supported by adequate, substantial and credible evidence on the record.” | 29 |
| 2 | Nester v. O'Donnell | green | “susceptible to at least two reasonable alternative interpretations.” | 11 |
| 3 | Nester v. O'Donnell | green | “an ambiguity in a contract exists if the terms of the contract are susceptible to at least two reasonable alternative interpretations.” | 7 |
| 4 | Conway v. 287 Corporate Center Associates | green | “consider all of the relevant evidence that will assist in determining the intent and meaning of the contract.” | 4 |
| 5 | Capparelli v. Lopatin | green | “a contract is ambiguous if its terms are 'susceptible to at least two reasonable alternative interpretations.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.