7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 335 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Ocasio-Hernandez v. Fortuno-Burset.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ocasio-Hernandez v. Fortuno-Burset Anchor | green | “the relevant inquiry focuses on the reasonableness of the inference of liability that the plaintiff is asking the court to draw from the facts alleged in the complaint.” | 111 |
| 2 | Ruiz Rivera v. PEIZER PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC | green | “possess enough heft to show that plaintiff is entitled to relief.” | 92 |
| 3 | Ruiz v. Bally Total Fitness Holding Corp. | green | “must assume the truth of all well-pleaded facts and give the plaintiff the benefit of all reasonable inferences therefrom.” | 55 |
| 4 | Ruiz v. Bally Total Fitness Holding Corp. | green | “must assume the truth of all well-pleaded facts and give plaintiff the benefit of all reasonable inferences therefrom.” | 40 |
| 5 | Conformis, Inc. v. Aetna, Inc. | green | “separate factual allegations from conclusory ones and then evaluate whether the factual allegations support a 'reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged.” | 16 |
| 6 | Frith v. Whole Foods Market, Inc. | green | “if the factual allegations in a complaint, stripped of conclusory legal allegations, raise no 'more than a sheer possibility that a defendant has acted unlawfully,' the complaint should be dismissed.” | 12 |
| 7 | National Labor Relations Board v. Solutia, Inc. | green | “step one: isolate and ignore statements in the complaint that simply offer legal labels and conclusions or merely rehash cause-of-action elements.” | 9 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.