4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 53 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Hunter v. Ferrell.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hunter v. Ferrell Anchor | green | “the petitioner bears the burden of showing that equitable tolling is warranted.” | 29 |
| 2 | Sandvik v. United States | green | “because of extraordinary circumstances that are both beyond his control and unavoidable with diligence.” | 16 |
| 3 | Gerard Joseph Pugh v. Hugh Smith | green | “by the conclusion of direct review or the expiration of the time for seeking such review.” | 4 |
| 4 | Gerard Joseph Pugh v. Hugh Smith | green | “the conclusion of direct review or the expiration of the time for seeking such review.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.