4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 53 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. W. R. Walters, United States of America v. Two Hundred Sixty-Two Firearms.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. W. R. Walters, United States of America v. Two Hundred Sixty-Two Firearms Anchor | green | “a party shall file objections with the district court or else waive right to appeal.” | 30 |
| 2 | Yeschick v. Mineta | green | “it is the party, not the court, who bears the burden of apprising the court of any changes to his or her mailing address.” | 11 |
| 3 | United States v. Robinson | green | “if the court will adopt the rr, then it may simply 'state that it engaged in a de novo review of the record and adopts the rr' without 'stating with specificity what it reviewed.” | 9 |
| 4 | United States v. Robinson | green | “state that it engaged in a de novo review of the record and adopts the rr” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.