3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 42 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Cracco v. Vitran Express, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cracco v. Vitran Express, Inc. Anchor | green | “when a responding party's statement fails to dispute the facts set forth in the moving party's statement in the manner dictated by the rule, those facts are deemed admitted for purposes of the motion.” | 28 |
| 2 | Judson Atkinson Candies, Inc. v. Latini-Hohberger Dhimantec | green | “it is inappropriate to make legal arguments in a rule 56.1 statement of facts.” | 7 |
| 3 | Judson Atkinson Candies, Inc. v. Latini-Hohberger Dhimantec | green | “t is inappropriate to make legal arguments in a rule 56.1 statement of facts” | 7 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.