Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 2,772 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. United States Gypsum Co..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. United States Gypsum Co. Anchor | green | “a finding is 'clearly erroneous' when although there is evidence to support it, the reviewing court on the entire evidence is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.” | 2,700 |
| 2 | George S. Krasnov v. Brendan Dinan | green | “completely devoid of minimum evidentiary support displaying some hue of credibility,” | 51 |
| 3 | Ressie Moore v. Ford Motor Company | green | “factual findings under a clearly erroneous standard, while legal conclusions are reviewed de novo.” | 11 |
| 4 | United States v. United States Gypsum Co. | green | “a finding is 'clearly erroneous' when, although there is evidence to support it, a review of the record leaves the court with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.” | 10 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.