5 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 258 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Dutcher v. Matheson.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dutcher v. Matheson Anchor | green | “since federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction, we presume no jurisdiction exists absent an adequate showing by the party invoking federal jurisdiction” | 138 |
| 2 | Brereton v. Bountiful City Corp. | green | “ismissals for lack of jurisdiction should be without prejudice because the court, having determined that it lacks jurisdiction over the action, is incapable of reaching a disposition on the merits of the underlying claims.” | 75 |
| 3 | D.L. v. Unified School District No. 497 | green | “younger abstention is jurisdictional” | 29 |
| 4 | D.L. v. Unified School District No. 497 | green | “younger abstention is jurisdictional.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.