2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 53 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Ladzinske v. Allen.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ladzinske v. Allen Anchor | green | “cases involving the grant or denial of mandamus are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the supreme court without regard to the underlying subject matter or the legal issues raised.” | 48 |
| 2 | Bland Farms, LLC v. Georgia Department of Agriculture | green | “mandamus is an extraordinary remedy to compel a public officer to perform a required duty when there is no other adequate legal remedy.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.