2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 53 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Hartig Drug Co Inc v. Senju Pharmaceutical Co Ltd.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hartig Drug Co Inc v. Senju Pharmaceutical Co Ltd Anchor | green | “a facial 12(b)(1) challenge, which attacks the complaint on its face without contesting its alleged facts, is like a 12(b)(6) motion in requiring the court to 'consider the allegations of the complaint as true.” | 29 |
| 2 | In Re Schering Plough Corp. Intron/Temodar Consumer Class Action | green | “a court must grant a motion to dismiss if it lacks subject-matter jurisdiction to hear a claim.” | 24 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.