4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 53 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Campbell.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Campbell Anchor | green | “what is substantially one transaction should not be made the basis for an unreasonable multiplication of charges against one person.” | 27 |
| 2 | United States v. Quiroz | green | “awesome, plenary, de novo power” | 11 |
| 3 | United States v. Savage | green | “unauthorized conviction has 'potential adverse consequences that may not be ignored,' and constitutes unauthorized punishment in and of itself.” | 8 |
| 4 | United States v. Anderson | green | “application of the quiroz factors involves a reasonableness determination, much like sentence appropriateness, and is a matter well within the discretion of the cca in the exercise of its article 66(c), ucmj, . . . powers.” | 7 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.