5 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 53 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Besinek v. Lamone.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Besinek v. Lamone Anchor | green | “a preliminary injunction is 'an extraordinary remedy never awarded as of right.” | 17 |
| 2 | Bennington Foods LLC v. St. Croix Renaissance Group, LLP | green | “must meet a higher standard of showing irreparable harm in the absence of an injunction.” | 10 |
| 3 | Brittan Holland v. Kelly Rosen | green | “the movant, by a clear showing, carries the burden of persuasion.” | 10 |
| 4 | Bennington Foods LLC v. St. Croix Renaissance Group, LLP | green | “where the relief ordered by the preliminary injunction is mandatory and will alter the status quo, the party seeking the injunction must meet a higher standard of showing irreparable harm in the absence of an injunction.” | 8 |
| 5 | Brittan Holland v. Kelly Rosen | green | “unless the movant, by a clear showing, carries the burden of persuasion.” | 8 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.