2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 53 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Egbert v. Boule.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Egbert v. Boule Anchor | green | “often resolve to a single question: whether there is any reason to think that congress might be better equipped to create a damages remedy.” | 34 |
| 2 | Logsdon v. United States Marshal Service | green | “is on course to treating bivens as a relic of the 20th century” | 19 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.