7 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 331 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Angelo Clark v. Robert Coupe.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Angelo Clark v. Robert Coupe Anchor | green | “a claim is facially plausible 'when the plaintiff pleads factual content that allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged.” | 106 |
| 2 | Rhonda Wilson v. USI Insurance Services LLC | green | “disregard legal conclusions and recitals of the elements of a cause of action that are supported only by mere conclusory statements.” | 104 |
| 3 | Iwanowa v. Ford Motor Co. | green | “the complaint, on its face, does not allege sufficient grounds to establish subject matter jurisdiction.” | 41 |
| 4 | Hartig Drug Co Inc v. Senju Pharmaceutical Co Ltd | green | “therefore, a 12(b)(1) factual challenge strips the plaintiff of the protections and factual deference provided under 12(b)(6) review.” | 35 |
| 5 | Hartig Drug Co Inc v. Senju Pharmaceutical Co Ltd | green | “attacks allegations underlying the assertion of jurisdiction in the complaint, and it allows the defendant to present competing facts.” | 28 |
| 6 | Wright v. New Jersey/Department of Education | green | “is a jurisdictional bar which deprives federal courts of subject matter jurisdiction.” | 13 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.