3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 53 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from S.M.S. Textile Mills, Inc. v. Brown, Jacobson, Tillinghast, Lahan & King, P.C..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | S.M.S. Textile Mills, Inc. v. Brown, Jacobson, Tillinghast, Lahan & King, P.C. Anchor | green | “a claim under cutpa must be pleaded with particularity to allow evaluation of the legal theory upon which the claim is based.” | 28 |
| 2 | Pergament v. Green | green | “in order to allege a cutpa violation properly, the plaintiff must allege, inter alia, that the acts complained of were performed in a trade or business.” | 15 |
| 3 | A-G Foods, Inc. v. Pepperidge Farm, Inc. | green | “no person shall engage in unfair methods of competition and unfair or deceptive acts or practices in the conduct of any trade or commerce.” | 10 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.