4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 52 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Meridian Bank v. Eugene Alten, Marlene Alten, and Thomas J. Subranni, Trustee Eugene and Marlene Alten.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Meridian Bank v. Eugene Alten, Marlene Alten, and Thomas J. Subranni, Trustee Eugene and Marlene Alten Anchor | green | “break down mixed questions of law and fact, applying the appropriate standard to each component.” | 32 |
| 2 | Meridian Bank v. Eugene Alten, Marlene Alten, and Thomas J. Subranni, Trustee Eugene and Marlene Alten | green | “must break down mixed questions of law and fact, applying the appropriate standard to each component.” | 9 |
| 3 | Imerys Talc America, Inc v. | green | “reviews the bankruptcy court's legal determinations de novo, its factual findings for clear error, and its discretionary decisions for abuse of discretion.” | 7 |
| 4 | Federal Trade Commission v. AbbVie Inc | green | “a finding is clearly erroneous when 'although there is evidence to support it, the reviewing court on the entire evidence is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.