6 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 52 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In re Reno.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In re Reno Anchor | green | “in theory, the aggregate prejudice from several different errors occurring at trial could require reversal even if no single error was prejudicial by itself.” | 27 |
| 2 | People v. Centeno | green | “wide latitude to discuss and draw inferences from the evidence at trial,' and whether 'the inferences the prosecutor draws are reasonable is for the jury to decide.” | 10 |
| 3 | People v. Berutko | green | “it is settled that where a defendant waives a jury trial he is deemed to have consented to a trial of all of the issues in the case before the court sitting without a jury.” | 5 |
| 4 | Richardson v. Superior Court of Tulare County | green | “after an examination of the entire cause, including the evidence,” | 4 |
| 5 | Richardson v. Superior Court of Tulare County | green | “a 'miscarriage of justice' should be declared only when the court, 'after an examination of the entire cause, including the evidence,' is of the 'opinion' that it is reasonably probable that a result more favorable to the appealing party would have been reached in the absence of…” | 3 |
| 6 | Richardson v. Superior Court of Tulare County | green | “under the watson standard, prejudicial error is shown where ' " 'after an examination of the entire cause, including the evidence,' the reviewing court is of the 'opinion' that it is reasonably probable that a result more favorable to the appealing party would have been reached …” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.