7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 52 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Hafdahl v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hafdahl v. State Anchor | green | “brady and its progeny do not require prosecuting authorities to disclose exculpatory information to defendants that the state does not have in its possession and that is not known to exist.” | 13 |
| 2 | Pena, Jose Luis | green | “brady and its progeny do not require prosecuting authorities to disclose exculpatory information to defendants that the state does not have in its possession and that is not known to exist.” | 13 |
| 3 | Murphy v. State | green | “proof beyond a reasonable doubt” | 7 |
| 4 | Pena, Jose Luis | green | “in light of all the evidence, it is reasonably probable that the outcome of the trial would have been different had the prosecutor made a timely disclosure.” | 7 |
| 5 | Ex Parte Robbins | green | “there is a reasonable likelihood that the false testimony could have affected the judgment of the jury.” | 6 |
| 6 | Johnson v. State | green | “are destroyed within a certain amount of time.” | 3 |
| 7 | Anthony Terrell Latson v. State | green | “proves to you individually kind of in your heart, in your mind that the defendant is guilty” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.