2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 40 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from El-Moussa v. Holder.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | El-Moussa v. Holder Anchor | green | “issues adverted to in a perfunctory manner, unaccompanied by some effort at developed argumentation, are deemed waived. it is not sufficient for a party to mention a possible argument in skeletal way, leaving the court to put flesh on its bones.” | 24 |
| 2 | United States v. Dominguez-Chavez | green | “dominguez has failed to adequately raise or develop his due process and equal protection arguments in his appellate brief, and, thus, they are waived.” | 16 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.